The Political India
External Affairs National Others

‘Surgical strikes’ unnecessarily hyped, says General who oversaw Uri operation

Lt General (retired) DS Hooda said the overhype of the strikes did not help and it is not good when military operations get politicised.

Lt General (retired) DS Hooda, who was the Northern Army Commander in September 2016 when Indian army carried out surgical strikes on terror launch pads along the Line of Control in the wake of the Uri attack, said, on Friday, December 7, the overhype of the strikes did not help and it is not good when military operations get politicised.

Describing the retributive actions across the LoC (Line of Control) as “business as usual” for the forces, decorated war veterans, taking part in a panel discussion on ‘Role of Cross-Border Operations and Surgical Strikes’ on the first day of the Military Literature Festival, flayed the Modi government for politicisation of the Army’s operational successes to further its political ends.

Hooda said it was natural to have initial euphoria about the success but the constant maintenance of hype around the military operations was unwarranted. Responding to a question from the audience, Hooda said: “In hindsight, it would have been better had we done it secretly.”

The aim of any such offensive had to be not only tactical but strategic too, which substantially hampers enemy morale, he said, adding that he could not say with certainty if India had actually achieved that objective in full measure.

During the discussion, defence commentator Ajai Shukla cautioned against the trend to colour military achievements with political motives. He also underlined the need to maintain operational decency and sanctity of the operations undertaken by the defence forces.

The excessive publicity of the September 2016 strikes, which had in fact been a reactionary strike conducted after the Pathankot and Uri attacks on the Indian Army, had set a dangerous benchmark for the Indian political dispensation, which they would find difficult to maintain in the eventuality of future terror attacks, Shukla said.

He said that it was only wishful to assume that the strikes on terrorist hubs in Pakistani Kashmir would have any deterrent effect on Pakistan or push it to alter its terror policy against India.

Shukla added that Pakistan had, in fact, been emboldened by the strikes as they knew now that the Indian government would be always be under immense pressure to strike across the border after each terror attack.

Citing the example of the 1981 Israeli air strikes on Iraqi nuclear sites, which had caused considerable damage, Lt Gen NS Brar underscored the need to ensure long-term impact on the enemy before undertaking any such operation in the future.

Cautioning the political masters against being adventurists, Brar asked if the political masters would have taken responsibility had there been any casualties in the strikes.

Lt Gen JS Cheema said it was too simplistic to assume that Pakistan would rethink its course of action against India after the much advertised surgical strikes.

The MLF is being held here from December 7 to 9.

Courtesy : National Herald

Related posts

SC refuses to entertain plea seeking minimum wages for workers in unorganised sector

Mayank Jain

Preity Zinta's molestation case against Ness Wadia cancelled by high court

Nisha Bansal

Noida Woman Burns Minor Boy’s Genitals With Hot Tongs for Refusing Sex, On the Run

Nisha Bansal

Amid Fears of US Sanctions Over S-400 Deal, Army Chief Says India Follows 'Independent Policy'

Nisha Bansal

Diwali a special opportunity to reflect on India-US friendship: Donald Trump

Mayank Jain

Lancet report: Mental health disorders on the rise in India

Mayank Jain